Central : Journal Of Economics and Law follow the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE-) in all matters related to the ethics of publication, Central : Journal Of Economics and Law COPE adapts to meet the highest standards of ethics intended for editors, writers, and Reviewer. The publisher does not have the right to interfere with the integrity of the paper and is only responsible for publishing regularly and on time.
- Editor Party Must ensure that writers follow the procedures/rules of writing in the Central : Journal of Economics And Law.
- The Editor can communicate with the Journal Manager, Editor, and Reviewer other in taking the Final Decision.
- Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interest
- The Editor must provide manuscripts to assess objectively without seeing aspects of nationality, ethnicity, political affiliation, ethnicity, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation author.
- Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interest.
- Editors must ensure that the manuscript sent to reviewers does not contain information about the author, and vice versa
- Decisions editors must be delivered to the author with responses Reviewer, except for responses that are personal or libelous.
- Editors should honor requests from writers who refuse individuals to evaluate manuscripts for reasons unacceptable.
- When the Editor finds or suspects a Violation of action writing and conflict authorship, editors can follow the guidelines in the flow diagram in resolving conflict COPE authorship.
- Editor and all staff must ensure the confidentiality of all the manuscripts received
- Reviewers are asked to provide an assessment of the substance of the manuscript by the Focus and Scope Journal and provide recommendations on the assessment.
- Reviewers are asked to provide comments on the manuscript if it is suspected to find procedural mistakes in writing, publishing, and publishing ethics
- Mitra Bestari can complete work at a predetermined time and provide information to the editor if they are unable to meet the time limit specified.
- Reviewers must be able to be confidential manuscripts Authors.
- Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for appraisal, if potential conflicts of interest, both individually and collaboratively with any institution.
- Reviewers should ask for consideration from the Editor on the similarity of substance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration or the manuscript that was published more in common with the Author Author or other.
- Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.
- The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and has no plagiarism.
- The author must ensure that the manuscript has not been published previously and has never been assigned the rights to the article to the other party.
- The author ensures that the manuscript Send tends to the work itself and follows the standard rules by the format quoting the appropriate reference.
- The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and does not engage in plagiarism or automatic plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism
- Authors must follow the procedures established by Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis.
- The author does not send the manuscript together with the same topic and title to another journal.
- Authors should be able to provide information and make research data-related details when the editor discovered the alleged doubts or falsification or plagiarism in the manuscripts.
- If the author finds any errors or inaccuracies that affect the manuscript which has been sent, the writer must promptly notify the Editor to immediately withdraw the manuscript writing and repair.
- The author is not allowed to withdraw the article being reviewed by the reviewer before being restored by a Reviewer to the Editor.